|
s
you may know, skyrocketing insurance premiums are debilitating the
nation's health care delivery system. Liability insurers are leaving the
market or raising rates to astronomical levels. This has caused
physicians, hospitals and other health care providers to severely limit
their practices or to discontinue practicing altogether. The exodus of
these providers from the practice of medicine could continue, and
patients will find it increasingly difficult and more expensive to
obtain needed health care.
President
Bush outlined his plan for addressing this issue when he visited
Collinsville on January 5, 2005. The President is committed to medical
liability reform this year, and it is my hope that the House and Senate
will move swiftly to introduce legislation on this topic as well.
President Bush's proposal includes:
*Securing the ability of injured patients to get quick,
unlimited compensation for their "economic losses," including the loss
of ability to provide unpaid services like care for children or parents;
*Ensuring recoveries for non-economic damages do not exceed
a reasonable amount ($250,000);
*Reserving punitive damages for egregious cases where they
are justified, and limiting damages to reasonable amounts;
*Providing for payments of judgments over time rather than
in a single lump sum, to ensure that appropriate payments are made when
patients need them;
*Ensuring that old cases cannot be brought to court years
after an event; and
*Providing that defendants pay judgments in proportion to
their fault.
During the 108th Congress, the House of Representatives passed
legislation that included several of the President's proposals. The
bipartisan HEALTH Act (HR 5 in 108th Congress), modeled after
California's highly successful health care litigation reforms, passed
the U. S. House for the first time in March of 2003. The bill was
brought up for a vote again, under the same premise. HR 4280 passed the
US House on May 12,
2004, with the goal of reducing the excessive burden the liability
system places on the health care delivery system. I supported this
legislation when it passed the House on both occasions.
It is also important to remember that the HEALTH Act from the 108th
Congress would not preempt any State law by limiting either higher or
lower caps. The bill would not prohibit any
State law that imposes greater protections in other areas covered by the
legislation.
The US House of
Representatives has begun the process of working towards new legislation
on medical liability reform, and I hope to see that legislation
introduced. Also, the House Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee, of
which I am a member, held a hearing on February 10, 2005 entitled
"Current Issues Related to Medical Liability Reform". I was pleased to
take part in this hearing, which focused on the role of patients,
physicians, insurers, and attorneys in this debate.
Although this hearing took place on the federal level, BOTH the state
and federal government can and should take action on this urgent issue.
Read more about
it . . .
Read more about
issues related
to Medical Liability Reform at
the
U.S. Congress on the Internet. |
|